See below or click here to download a copy.

RAPAR /// The Manchester-based human rights organisation working with displaced people 
PRESS RELEASE /// For immediate release /// 22nd December 2011

HUNGER STRIKER NOW HANDCUFFED TO HILLINGDON HOSPITAL BED
  • After 36 days’ hunger strike, Mortada, of Eastern Sudan, removed to hospital and handcuffed to his bed
  • Mortada is not a criminal and should be treated with respect
  • Friday 23rd December, 2pm, Solidarity and Protest vigil outside Immigration Appeals Tribunal Court, Mount Street, Manchester
The dehumanising treatment and continuing threat of removal facing Mortada, aged 36, from Eastern Sudan, is being highlighted by the Beja Congress, the opposition party of East Sudan, alongside RAPAR tomorrow.  
Mortada Mohamed Ahmed, from Eastern Sudan,  who had not eaten from 9th November until last Friday was taken to Hillingdon Hospital and then handcuffed to his bed.  

Isaac Shaffer from Wilson Solicitors LLP, his lawyer, said "Our client was transferred from Immigration detention and has been receiving emergency medical treatment in hospital for several days now. His admission was preceded by a hunger strike of over 30 days - a protest against his treatment by the Home Office, and in particular against his prolonged immigration detention.

However, despite being hospitalized due to his fragile medical condition (and the acute concern of independent medical experts - who also note their finding that he is a victim of torture), we have now been informed that he is currently being restrained to his hospital bed via metal handcuffs. We strongly consider that there is nothing to indicate that this continued and egregious infringement upon our client’s fundamental right to liberty is appropriate."    .   

Having already won an injunction preventing removal, the legal process to ensure he can stay in the UK continues. His lawyer stated: "We remain deeply concerned about the health and well-being of our client. We strongly hope that now, following the High Court's grant of an injunction against removal, the Home Office will urgently reconsider whether his continued and prolonged detention remains lawful and indeed reasonable in the circumstances."

Abu Amna, a member of the Beja Congress and friend of Mortada said, “I think it is very inhumane to treat a patient like that. So long as he is in hospital, he is a patient, he should be treated like other patients. He is in the care of the medical staff and I wonder why they tolerate such practices. Since the UKBA policy says "Restraints must not be used to attach detainees to furniture or any other fixtures and fittings", something must have gone terribly wrong. He is a patient and must not be treated like this in the hospital.”

RAPAR spokesperson Nahella Ashraf said ”We call upon anyone who can to take a few minutes out of their preparations for the Christmas holiday to stand with us in defence of Mortada beside the Mount Street tram stop in City Centre Manchester at 2pm tomorrow, Friday. The cuffs must come off immediately.”

For background and previous press releases and updates see Mortada's campaign page.
For further information see:  http://www.sudaneseonline.com/english/

Contact: 
Nahella Ashraf, RAPAR, on 07988572976 
Mohammed Alhalennsy of the Beja Congress, on 07400973235
Dr Rhetta Moran, RAPAR, on 07776264646

 
 
See below or click here to download a copy.

RAPAR /// The Manchester-based Human Rights organisation working with displaced people
PRESS RELEASE /// 14th December 2011


UKBA TRIES TO REMOVE HUNGER STRIKER  WHO HAS BEEN MEDICALLY ASSESSED AS UNFIT TO FLY

The Manchester-based Human Rights organisation RAPAR has condemned the UK Border Agency's decision to  issue removal directions for Friday, December 16th, to a man who has been on hunger strike for 35 days and has been medically assessed as being unfit to fly.

RAPAR  and Medical Justice are working with Mortada Mohamed Ahmed, from Eastern Sudan,  who has not eaten since 9th November. Medical Justice says that an independent doctor who has been visiting and monitoring Mortada has assessed him as unfit to fly or to be detained  and has said he should be in hospital.

Three days ago, Mortada's friend Mohamed, who is also from East Sudan, contacted RAPAR for help.  Mortada, aged 36, is currently in the medical wing at Colnbrook Detention Centre near Heathrow Airport.

When RAPAR established direct telephone contact with Mortada on Monday, he said he would rather die here in the UK than be returned to the Sudan from where he fled in 2005 during the Port Sudan Massacre.  He began his hunger strike after he was detained and told by the Home Office that he was going to be sent back to Sudan.  “I started the hunger strike because I do not have any choice” he added.  

Mortada’s remaining brother and sister are living in Saudi Arabia - the rest of his family died in the Sudan.

On Monday, RAPAR faxed an authorisation form to Colnbrook Detention Centre for Mortada to sign and return.  This form would give RAPAR permission to share information about him.  The form has not yet been given to Mortada but, within 24 hours of the fax being sent, the UKBA served Mortada with removal directions.

The removal directions are for this Friday, 16th December at 09:30 on Gulf Air via Bahrain to Sudan.   “It is illegal to attempt to make anyone fly after day 30 if they are on  hunger strike, so why are the UKBA attempting to do this?” a RAPAR spokesperson  asked.

James Fallah Williams of RAPAR, who was himself on hunger strike for 19 days earlier this year said:  “When I spoke to Mortada’s lawyer yesterday he told me he was ‘on the case’.  I have just spoken with Mortada today and he sounds very weak.”
 
A spokesperson for Medical Justice who has seen Mortada in Colnbrook said:  “An independent doctor who visited him, and has been monitoring him since, has assessed him as not fit to fly or to be detained and that he should be taken to hospital for further assessment.”

Dr Abuamna, a leading member of the Eastern Sudanese diaspora who is based in Manchester, said:  “It would be unsafe for Mortada to go back to the Sudan now because there are so many human rights violations in Eastern Sudan.  The government has been targeting and detaining activists from the Beja Congress, including ex-fighters from the Eastern Sudan.”

For further information see:  http://www.sudaneseonline.com/english/

For more details, please contact: 

James Fallah Williams, RAPAR, on 07586084434
Dr Rhetta Moran, RAPAR, on 07776264646

 

 
 
Bahrain Conference /// 17th December 2011 /// Friends' Meeting House (Main Hall), 6 Mount Street, Manchester, M2 5NS /// (See RAPAR's Bahrain Solidarity Campaign page here)

Agenda

10.30-11.00: Registration & refreshments

11.00-11.15: Introduction from Tony Lloyd MP

11.15-12.30: Panel 1 - The Political Situation - followed by Q&A         

Dr. Saeed Al Shehabi - English speech (10 mins)           
Opposition Leader - Bahrain Freedom Movement www.vob.org - Bahrain / UK

A. Raoof Al Shayeb - Arabic speech (10 Mins) 
Opposition leader - Official spokesman of 14 Feb coalition - Bahrain / UK

Nabeel Rajab - English speech (10 mins) (recorded testimony)
Ion Ratiu Democracy Award Winner 2011, President of Bahrain Center for Human Rights, Deputy Secretary General of FIDH, MENA Advisory member of Human Rights Watch www.bahrainrights.org

Prof. William Lucas - English speech (10 mins)          
http://www.enduringamerica.com/scott-lucas  
Scott Lucas is Professor of American Studies at the University of Birmingham, where he has worked since 1989. A specialist in US and British foreign policy, he has written and edited nine books, published many important articles, presented a radio documentary, and also co-directed the 2007 film Laban!.

12.30-1.30: Lunch

1.30-2.15: Panel 2 - Eyewitness Accounts - followed by Q&A                                     

Fahad Desmukh - English speech (7 mins) (recorded testimony)
Blogger and journalist

Dr. Falah Rabee - Arabic speech  (5 Mins)  
Member of Al Wefaq, political activist   

Dr. Zahra Al Sammak - English speech (5 mins) (recorded testimony) 
Will deliver a speech on behalf of sentenced doctors.
Dr. Zahra Al Sammak is a senior consultant anesthesiologist as well as an assistant professor at the College of Medicine, Arabian Gulf University.

Mrs. Rula Al Saffar - English speech (5 mins) (recorded testimony)
Will deliver a speech about the situation for nurses including the suspensions of nursing staff.
President of Bahrain Nursing Society

Ms. Waffa Al Noaimi - English speech (5 mins) (recorded testimony)
Sister of Saeed Al Noaimi who was given a death sentence, later reduced to life sentence.

Jaleela Al Salman - English speech (5 mins) (recorded testimony)
Vice president – Bahrain teacher association

Mr. A Shaheed Al Markhi                                                                                   
Specialist nurse at the Salmaniya Medical Complex in Bahrain. Mr Al Markhi will be with the eyewitness panel to take Q&A.

2.15-3.15: Panel 3 – The Way Forward - followed by Q&A                                     

Mr. Abbas Busafwan - Arabic speech (10 Mins)    
Bahraini Journalist and political activist, member of Al Wefaq             

Jawad Abdul Wahab - Arabic speech (10 Mins)
Bahraini journalist, member of Amal political society. 

Dr. Ali Al Faraj - English speech (5 mins)                       
Bahriani doctor living & working in UK; political activist

Mohammed Sadiq - English speech (5 mins)   
Chairman of 'Justice for Bahrain' and human rights activist. Mr Sadiq has campaigned on issues surrounding Palestine, Iraq, Lebanon and now Bahrain. He is a specialist in media campaigning and lobbying parliament.

Mark Krantz - English speech (10 mins)

3.15-3.20: Closing Remarks

3.30-4.20: Film showing - 'Shouting in the Dark'

 
 
RAPAR // The Manchester-based Human Rights organisation working with displaced people
PRESS RELEASE // For immediate release – Thursday, December 8th 2011 // Download a copy
KEEP MANJEET SAFE IN THE UK 

DISABLED WOMAN SEEKING ASYLUM TAKES CASE TO HIGH COURT

·         Solidarity vigil to be held outside Manchester Civil Justice Centre, 1 Bridge Street West (corner of Gartside Street), Manchester. 10 am, Monday, December 19th

A disabled woman who claimed asylum in the UK after her husband disappeared in India has won the right to a judicial review at the High Court in Manchester.

Manjeet Kaur, who lives in Whalley Range, came to the UK in March, a month after the disappearance of her husband Amitt Bhatt - a journalist and Kashmir human rights activist who was threatened and attacked because of his anti government articles and books. In the past, Amitt has spoken on the same human rights platform as Jemima Khan.

Manjeet fled to the UK because she was beaten twice and threatened with rape and murder by people who were looking for her husband. She uses a wheelchair due to paralysis caused by polio and the injuries she sustained during the beatings have worsened her condition.

Manjeet was born and lived in Afghanistan until the death of her father, a doctor in Kabul. Since her husband disappeared,  Manjeet has no-one to care for her in India but she has relatives in England who can support her.   

The UK Border Agency has refused her asylum claim and wants to return her to India where 90 per cent of the infrastructure is not accessible to wheelchairs  - this would severely restrict her ability to protect herself from more attacks.

Manjeet is taking her case to the High Court to challenge the UKBA's decision to refuse an “in country” appeal against the rejection of her asylum claim. A High Court judge has given permission for a judicial review of the decision, and Manjeet has received financial backing from trade unions and individuals in order to pursue her case. 

Her campaign, organised by RAPAR, is backed by trade unionists and community and disability rights activists.  The International Federation of Journalists is currently in contact with journalist trade unions in India in a bid to find news of her husband. 

Manjeet's solicitor, Gary McIndoe, of Latitude Law, said: “In granting permission for judicial review, His Honour Judge Pelling QC recognised the high threshold the Secretary of State must reach before she may certify a claim for protection.   It is Manjeet's case that this threshold has not been reached; her evidence of her husband Amitt's politically motivated disappearance, and the physical harm she has suffered, make this a clearly arguable case.” 

Dr Rhetta Moran, of RAPAR, added: “The level of support Manjeet has attracted from all sections of the community is a testimony to the strength of her case and to  the way she has used her skills to work with people in her community and with other people seeking asylum.” 

For more information, please contact: 

Kath Grant 07812471047
Rhetta Moran 07776264646

Details of Manjeet's case can also be found on the RAPAR website at www.rapar.org.uk/keep-manjeet-safe-in-the-uk.html

 
 

Report here, petition here.
The report 'Unsafe Return' has been compiled by Catherine Ramos of Justice First, who says: 'The report describes the imprisonment and torture of nine out of eleven Congolese asylum seekers, all Justice First clients, removed to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.  

'The tenth man is a 'disappeared' person.  The eleventh client was a voluntary returnee who is missing and did not pick up her reintegration package. It also includes the testimony of six clients from other civil society groups in the UK removed between 2006 and summer 2011. Of nine children removed with parents or mother, six were imprisoned. 
  
'The report includes an interview with an Immigration officer who confirms that failed asylum seekers are seen as traitors who have betrayed the President and country for having talked about the human rights abuses they suffered in DRC before they sought asylum.  He states there will be no mercy.'

Justice First have started an e-petition and are hoping to get the 100,000 signatures required for the issue to be debated in the commons. Sign the petition here.
 
 
See article and video in the Independent here. (Text copied below.)

Melanie Newman, Oliver Wright
Caught on camera: top lobbyists boasting how they influence the PM

Special undercover investigation: Executives from Bell Pottinger reveal 'dark arts' they use to burnish reputations of countries accused of human rights violations

One of Britain's largest lobbying companies has been secretly recorded boasting about its access to the heart of the Government and how it uses the "dark arts" to bury bad coverage and influence public opinion. An undercover investigation by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, published in The Independent today, has taped senior executives at Bell Pottinger:

* Claiming they have used their access to Downing Street to get David Cameron to speak to the Chinese premier on behalf of one of their business clients within 24 hours of asking him to do so;

* Boasting about Bell Pottinger's access to the Foreign Secretary William Hague, to Mr Cameron's chief of staff Ed Llewellyn and to Mr Cameron's old friend and closest No 10 adviser Steve Hilton;

* Suggesting that the company could manipulate Google results to "drown" out negative coverage of human rights violations and child labour;

* Revealing that Bell Pottinger has a team which "sorts" negative Wikipedia coverage of clients;

* Saying it was possible to use MPs known to be critical of investigative programmes to attack their reporting for minor errors.

Reporters from the Bureau posed as agents for the government of Uzbekistan – a brutal dictatorship responsible for killings, human rights violations and child labour – and representatives of its cotton industry in a bid to discover what promises British lobbying and public relations firms were prepared to make when pitching to clients, what techniques they use, and how much of their work is open to public scrutiny.

In Uzbekistan, child labour is used in cotton fields to fulfil state quotas and the country also has a terrible human rights record: the think tank Freedom House put it on its 2011 list of the "Worst of the Worst" repressive regimes.

'I've been working with Hilton, Cameron, Osborne, for 20 years'

The Bureau contacted ten London firms. Two refused to take the business, several others did not reply, while five including Bell Pottinger appeared to be keen to work with the fictitious Uzbek representatives. Bell Pottinger quoted "£1m-plus" as a fee for carrying out the work.

Their claims – which were secretly recorded – will add to mounting concerns that an absence of regulation has made London the global centre for "reputation laundering", where lobbyists work behind the scenes on behalf of the world's most controversial regimes.

David Cameron pledged to tackle lobbying five years ago and then again last year, saying it was "the next big scandal waiting to happen" and "has tainted our politics for too long, an issue that exposes the far-too-cosy relationship between politics, government, business and money". He said he wanted to shine "the light of transparency" on lobbying so that politics "comes clean about who is buying power and influence".

During two undercover meetings in June and July 2011 at its Chancery Lane offices, senior Bell Pottinger executives showed few signs of being deterred by Uzbekistan's dire reputation. They made it clear that the Uzbek government would need to put genuine reforms in place if it were to improve its image and outlined how it could work with the Government, Parliament and the media to do so.

They talked openly about the work the firm had done with other regimes with questionable human rights records including Sri Lanka and Belarus and how they could navigate the corridors of power for clients.

Tim Collins, managing director of Bell Pottinger Public Affairs, told the reporters he used to be Mr Llewellyn's boss in Conservative Central Office, and had worked with Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne in the Conservative Research Department.

"I've been working with people like Steve Hilton, David Cameron, George Osborne for 20 years-plus. There is not a problem getting the messages through," he said.

His colleague David Wilson boasted the firm was the "most powerful public affairs business in the country". Asked whether he could help organise a meeting between Mr Cameron and the Uzbek President – despite protocol dictating that such meetings are organised by ambassadors – he said: "We can facilitate that".

Mr Collins later clarified that such a meeting might be an "end point" to aim for, once the country was seen to be genuinely improving its human rights record.

'David Cameron raised it with the Chinese Prime Minister'

During the undercover meeting, Bell Pottinger – whose chairman is Margaret Thatcher's former media adviser Lord (Tim) Bell – claimed to have used its influence on behalf of the engineering firm Dyson to ask Mr Cameron to complain about copyright infringement to the Chinese premier Wen Jiabao during a state visit in June 2011.

"We were rung up at 2.30 on a Friday afternoon, by one of our clients, Dyson," Mr Collins explained. "He said 'We've got a huge issue. A lot of our products are being ripped off in China.' On the Saturday David Cameron raised it with the Chinese Prime Minister."

He added that, "He [Cameron] was doing it because we asked him to do it," and because the issue was in the wider national interest. In terms of very fast turnaround and getting things done right at the top of government, if you've got the right message, we can do it," he said.

Mr Collins also recommended a meeting with Daniel Finkelstein, chief leader writer at The Times – who he said was very close to Mr Cameron. "He will sit down and have lunch with just about anybody," he said. "That doesn't mean he's going to agree with them, but occasionally something out of that lunch will get dropped into a future column."

Joint events could be held with influential think tanks close to government, such as Policy Exchange, the firm suggested. Another strategy would include passing information to key academics "so that they are then blogging the right messages out there – so it's coming from an independent," said Mr Wilson.

Mr Finkelstein said last night: "I am flattered if anyone thinks I am interesting enough to have lunch with. But anyone promoting either undemocratic or anti-social policies would find me a pretty closed door and hasn't to my knowledge come knocking".

'We've got all sorts of dark arts'

Discussing techniques for managing reputations online, Mr Wilson mentioned a team that could "sort" Wikipedia.

"We've got all sorts of dark arts," added Mr Collins. "I told him [David Wilson] he couldn't put them in the written presentation because it's embarrassing if it gets out."

A presentation shown during the meeting said it could "create and maintain third-party blogs" – blogs that appeared to be independent. These would contain positive content and popular key words that would rank highly in Google searches.

The pair also explained how the firm enables government videos and articles to move to the top of internet searches, while less favourable stories can move down the rankings.

"The ambition obviously is to drown that negative content and make sure that you have positive content out there online," Mr Wilson said.

The firm cited past examples of its work, included manipulating Google rankings for an East African money transfer company called Dahabshiil. Bell Pottinger executives said they had ensured that references to a former Dahabshill employee subsequently detained in Guantanamo Bay because of alleged links to al-Qai'da disappeared from the first 10 pages of a Google search for the company.

Another defensive method cited in the meeting was the use of politicians to attack a broadcaster.

"There are a lot of people in Parliament who can't stand Channel 4 and can't stand Dispatches," Mr Collins said.

"So if there are any inaccuracies, even if they're fairly minor, you can work with some people who have a track record of not liking Channel 4, wanting to score points against Channel 4 [who will say:] 'Here is another instance of Channel 4 over-reaching themselves and putting out stuff they haven't properly checked'."

'Britain has this sort of moral ethic it thinks it can impose on the world'

Uzbekistan has recently expelled Human Rights Watch. The US think-tank Freedom House has said: "Uzbekistan's government continued to suppress all political opposition and restrict independent business activity in 2010. The few remaining civic activists and critical journalists in the country faced prosecution, fines, and lengthy prison terms."

In addition, Uzbekistan's cotton is the subject of an international boycott by several clothing manufacturers because the country still allegedly uses forced labour, including child labour, in its harvest.

Bureau journalists posed as members of the "Azimov Group" – a group of British and Eastern European investors concerned with exporting cotton textiles. They claimed they had been tasked by the Uzbek government with improving the country's image in the UK, and that the government would be committed to reform.

"A number of [our client] governments have had serious reputational issues," said Mr Collins.

But he also stressed a need for genuine commitment to reform. "Everything we are recommending is predicated on the agreement by the government to change," he said. "[That] justifies why a PR company is representing a country which previously people shouldn't have been talking to. Now it actually wants to change it is fully acceptable."

Another executive stressed, whilst talking about one of the firm's clients: "I wouldn't actually represent a client whom I didn't believe."

He added: "Just trying to sell the situation as it is or to say that things are changing when in reality they aren't is not going to work. Once we're clear that we've got the collateral, the proof that things are changing, then obviously we have the connections to get the message through to the right people."

'This is a £100,000-a-month campaign'

Bell Pottinger told the reporters that they had previously helped convince the EU that Belarus was committed to reform. But shortly after the EU lifted a travel ban on the Belarus President, the country went back to its old ways and the ban was eventually reinstated.

Bell Pottinger and the Belarus government stopped working together in 2009. Last week Belarus courts sentenced two men to death despite pleas for mercy and international outcry.

Changes did not need to be fast, Mr Collins said. "As long as you can see that each year is a little better than before, that's fine."

Bell Pottinger's services do not come cheap. "A million pounds plus," is what Mr Wilson quoted to do the job. "This is certainly a £100,000-a-month campaign, to make it very effective."

This would buy a media-relations campaign, online reputation management and the public-affairs team "working with you on a governmental level".

The country should stress its position as an emerging market, he suggested. "To the Western world it's a developing market so you can always have the message that: 'We are changing with the times – we are emerging, learning as a nation and growing'," he said.

He added: "Britain has this sort of moral ethic it thinks it can impose upon the world still because of our colonial background and the Commonwealth. We forget that 100 years ago we had kids working in cotton mills here."

Asked whether the firm would be prepared to work for the Azimov Group without knowing the identity of the campaign's ultimate funders, Mr Wilson said: "If the media asks us who your [our] client is, there has to be an audit trail." But a few seconds later also said: "In our work for Belarus, nobody knows who paid us."

Lord Bell was provided with details last Friday morning of the above. He responded yesterday via his lawyers, Carter Ruck, attacking the Bureau. Lord Bell said: "The conduct of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism does not remotely constitute responsible journalism. It is an attempt by unethical, deception to manufacture a story where none exists."

A spokeswoman for the Prime Minister said: "It is simply not true that Bell Pottinger or indeed any other lobbying company has any influence on government policy."

Downing Street sources said that the Dyson company's concerns had been raised with the Chinese premier, that it was a legitimate matter to raise and that they were unaware of Bell Pottinger's involvement.

Mr Dyson did not comment last night.

thebureauinvestigates.com

 
 
Stand beside Manjeet at 10am on 19th December
Manchester Civil Justice Centre, 1 Bridge Street West (corner of Gartside Street), Manchester M3 3EL

For details of Manjeet's story and campaign see below and here. Please feel free to distribute flyers - for a downloadable copy which can be attached to an email or printed choose one of these: .pdf / Word Please also share this page's address via Facebook and Twitter.
Manjeet with her lawyer Gary
(Left) Manjeet with her lawyer, Gary McIndoe, preparing for court. 

Donations from Trade Union branches and individuals in Greater Manchester have meant that Manjeet has been able to fight back legally…

For the next stage in this process we need your physical presence outside the courts…


·         Manjeet’s husband, Amitt Bhatt, a journalist and Kashmir human rights activist, was threatened and attacked because of his anti-government publications. He disappeared without trace in February 2011. 

·         Manjeet was beaten and threatened with rape and murder at her home in Delhi by people looking for her husband.  This is what led Manjeet to flee.

·         Manjeet uses a wheelchair due to paralysis from polio; the injuries sustained from the attacks have worsened her condition.

·         When she fled from India in March 2011 Manjeet was in fear for her life. She came to the UK to be with several family members who can offer her support.

·         At this time, the UKBA has refused her asylum claim and Manjeet is facing the threat of deportation to India; being bound to her wheelchair in a country where 90% of the infrastructure is wheelchair inaccessible will severely diminish her ability to protect herself.

For more on Manjeet’s campaign see here.